YouTube Reading
Click Below
My critique and treatise on Nietzsche's stand against systems.
Integrity [EPL]=Integer
OR
A fullness, a completeness. When termed this way if one would seek a system of betterment to become > complete?
Perhaps Quanta is a better term or quantification?
Nietzsche utilized a certain writing style that could very well be emulated. Is this not a system?
I believe that Nietzsche detested the despotic governmental system also the "fix all" snake oil salesman approach [byproduct] of said system.
No system is truly ever complete, as the energy from one bleeding system may be designed into the next system [Zoroths Law].
I think what Nietzsche was alluding to was that a system like Christianity was not and never could be complete nor trump any Natural System of Order. However Chaos, disruption and disorder could dystopically be viewed under the same context or meaning through the ever darkening lense of 'reality'.
Further however when Nietzsche states "the will towards" he is very specific of an intrinsic motivation to systemize everything by will of a person's nature IE the despot.
Randomness [self proclaimed artistic merit] is also a relished form of [self-proclaimed] personal godship and decadence. However may not be far from the Nietzschean (tormenting) Truth. [Flat-Time]
Stellarmass13
Notes:
Money [motivation/acquisition] Ruins People [into Pupal/Prolitariat]
Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely? I do not agree with. If one fully sees the reformation of system as a constant state of Flux. However one could always argue "isn't this also a system?".
The totality must thus become the past. Out of these ruins we should learn better? However much, most, if not all history has been occulted.
Also
Nietzsche's statement may be more to the point that intrinsic emptiness can not and will not lead to fullness through any formal reinvention of a system towards completeness. Perhaps to say "just be" and stop wasting arbitrary effort on becoming [anything]?