Saturday, August 16, 2025
Unslaved Podcast: Warlocks
Let’s dive deep into Warlocks. Since “warlock” has many layers (linguistic, folkloric, religious, occult, pop culture), I’ll break it down across history, etymology, cultural function, and modern portrayals.
🔹 1. Etymology and Roots
- Old English wÇ£rloga → literally means “oath-breaker” or “traitor.”
- wǣr = covenant/oath; loga = liar.
- By the Middle Ages, it carried the sense of a man in league with the Devil.
- Early Christian writers used it derogatorily to label heretics, oath-breakers, or sorcerers.
- In Scotland (16th century), “warlock” became synonymous with a male witch, often implying one who had made a pact with infernal powers.
🔹 2. Role in Witchcraft and Folklore
- Unlike witches (more commonly women in European witch trials), warlocks were seen as traitors to God and community, accused of gaining power through:
- Devil’s pact or “selling the soul.”
- Necromancy and spirit-binding.
- Cursing and maleficium (harmful magic).
- In Norse tradition, some scholars argue varðlokkur (“spirit-summoning songs”) may have influenced the later warlock. This ties warlocks to shamanic practices of binding and calling spirits.
🔹 3. Religious/Occult Dimensions
- Christian Demonology: warlocks were often classified alongside sorcerers, apostates, and magicians as damned figures who consciously chose infernal alliances.
- Occult Tradition: In ceremonial magic (e.g., grimoires), warlock-like figures were said to bind demons to serve them. Binding spirits is a recurring theme.
- EPL/Esoteric reading: the warlock archetype represents the one who breaks with divine order and chooses the left-hand path, working with inversion, shadow, and covenant-breaking power.
🔹 4. Archetype and Symbolism
- Oath-breaker: betrayer of divine law, symbol of rebellion.
- Spirit-binder: master of contracts, deals, and compelled entities.
- Male counterpart to the witch, but often portrayed as more solitary, secretive, or directly infernal.
- Modern occult reinterpretations: some neopagans reject “warlock” as a slur and prefer “witch” or “magician,” while others reclaim it as an empowered title for a sorcerer unbound by tradition.
🔹 5. Pop Culture Portrayals
- Dungeons & Dragons: Warlocks form pacts with otherworldly patrons (Fiends, Fey, Great Old Ones). The idea of power-for-contract is central.
- Marvel Comics: Warlock is both a heroic and alien figure, reframing the word away from “witchcraft.”
- Movies/TV: Often depicted as sorcerers who sell their soul, dangerous loners, or seekers of forbidden knowledge.
- Gaming/Anime: Warlocks are usually darker spellcasters compared to wizards, emphasizing curses, necromancy, and demonic bonds.
🔹 6. The Esoteric Reading (Deep Layer)
- The Warlock is a liminal figure:
- Not just a practitioner of forbidden arts, but a traitor to unity.
- He embodies the rift—the one who chose self over covenant, power over principle.
- In archetypal psychology, the Warlock mirrors the shadow magician: the one who has broken with the sacred order and harnesses inversion.
- In EPL terms, he could be seen as the counter-glory: not balancing, but absorbing for personal gain, disrupting the harmonics rather than refining them.
✅ In summary:
A warlock began as an “oath-breaker” and transformed into the archetype of the male witch who makes forbidden pacts. He symbolizes betrayal, spirit-binding, and the pursuit of power outside divine order. Today, the warlock stands as a liminal figure—sometimes villain, sometimes antihero—marking the line between knowledge and corruption, covenant and betrayal.
Tuesday, August 12, 2025
Frankenstein's Monster's Monster
Monday, August 11, 2025
Joseph Smith, Masonry, Mormon lineage, the Society of the Cincinnati, Howard Hughes’s “Mormon Mafia,” and elite bloodline
Saturday, August 9, 2025
Michael Tsarion: Scythians
Jordan Maxwell "Our Owners"
1. Admiralty/Maritime Law: The Hidden Legal System
Maxwell explains that modern society is subtly governed by two parallel legal systems:
-
Law of the Land: This refers to local, common-law jurisdictions—what most people think of as normal governance.
-
Law of the Sea (Admiralty Law): He asserts this is a supranational system embedded deep within banking, finance, and legal language—particularly maritime law.
According to Maxwell, many everyday concepts—like “berth” (birth), “manifest,” or being “liquid”—are not coincidental; they derive from maritime terminology and signal that we are viewed legally as cargo or products rather than sovereign humans.
2. Birth Certificates as “Certificate of Manifest”
In Maxwell’s framework, birth certificates are akin to a ship’s cargo manifest:
-
A birth (or “berth”) certificate names an “informant,” often interpreted as the state or government.
-
From that moment, humans become “stock”—owned and managed by the Department of Commerce or governmental corporation.
This metaphor underscores his assertion that we are not inherently free and autonomous—rather, we’re bound by contractual or corporate legal structures from birth.
3. Citizenship as Employment—Under a Corporate System
Maxwell highlights a legal shift in the U.S.:
-
He distinguishes between the United States of America (the republic, established in 1787) and ** UNITED STATES INC.** (a corporation reportedly formed in 1871 under the “Act of 1871”) .
-
In this view, every U.S. citizen is effectively an employee or “franchisee” of this corporate entity, not a sovereign individual.
-
Since citizens lack allodial (absolute) title to land or freedom, they instead hold “equitable interests,” meaning the corporation (the government) maintains ultimate ownership of property and even persons.
4. Sovereignty vs. Subjugation—“Our Owners”
Maxwell draws a stark contrast between:
-
Sovereigns: Historically, individuals who hold power and autonomy.
-
Subjects: Those who are governed, controlled, or owned.
His claim is that modern citizens—through legal and fiscal systems—have relinquished sovereignty, effectively becoming property—or owned—by a corporate state structure.
In this framework, being a citizen is less about rights and more about being an asset: “human resources,” “stock,” or “employees,” rather than autonomous individuals.
5. Why This Matters: The Occult Language of Law
Maxwell contends that this system is intentionally obscured through symbolic and legal language:
-
Terms like “liquid assets,” “manifest,” “vessel,” and even “franchise” are part of the vocabulary designed to mask our status within a commercial and maritime legal universe.
-
By exposing this “occult” language, Maxwell aims to liberate individuals—to reclaim personal sovereignty and challenge institutional control.
Summary Table
| Concept | Maxwell’s Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Maritime Law (Admiralty) | Hidden legal system underpinning modern governance |
| Birth Certificate | “Certificate of manifest”—symbol of being property |
| Citizenship | Employment under a corporate U.S. entity |
| Sovereignty vs. Subjecthood | Citizens as owned assets, not autonomous individuals |
| Legal Vocabulary | Occult language that conceals true legal structure |
Jordan Maxwell’s viewpoint is striking in its blend of symbolism, legal reinterpretation, and conspiracy analysis. Whether one agrees or not, his work invites a provocative re-examination of what it means to be free—or controlled—within modern legal systems.
Friday, August 8, 2025
EX 33rd-DEGREE MASON EXPOSES SECRET RITUALS & HIERARCHIES Dr. Bill .
Thursday, August 7, 2025
Pain as a 'Necessary' Firewall?
You Again
People lose mass over time.
As growth hormone wanes, so too does the amplified vitality of youth. The first instinct is to cut back, to burn the flab, to streamline. But what we call excess was once a feature—a byproduct of abundance, vigor, life. Now it drifts downward, closer to the gravity well. Closer to the floor.
Trimming the excess only shrinks the problem—it does not solve it.
The core issue is deeper: tissue building, repair, and vitality have been demoted in favor of survival and function. If we strip ourselves of the very nutrients and demands that once forged us, do we really become better—or simply less?
Has the drive left us? Or has it been refined?
Every part of the body, mind, and being must be challenged, expressed, tested. Without that push to higher levels, the purpose of our form dissolves in the static storm of data and code. Meaning is not passively found—it must be forged under pressure.
Every nutrient must be present—in strength and surplus. And stress must be met with greater response, replenishment, and resolve. Energy must answer the call of depletion.
“I desire!”
But to be what?
And the answer is clear. Perhaps the only thing ever worth being—
You.
You must become You again.
-
Annalie Cummings has come into the spotlight recently—but not as a mainstream public figure. Here’s a clearer picture of what’s currently k...






