Sex is the most accessible means by which an HPTA cymatic stimulus control mechanism can prompt motive—thereby leaving one vulnerable to supplanted ideas that, under the guise of verisimilitude and sense, or within the bounds of umwelt, appear to be true. Freud perceived this, but Zuse and Turing saw the machine. Meanwhile, Spinoza, Kant, Plato, and—dare I say—John Dee, recognized the mechanisms underlying this control structure.
A priori appears to be what it claims to be, and thus Ontology and Epistemology become little more than circuitous rhetorical redundancies. Husserl may have seemed vague to many, but he was at least close to the Truth. Nietzsche and Heidegger drew alarmingly near to the hub of philosophy. Leibniz—and of course Euclid—perceived the optical illusion. Plutchik and Maslow identified the emotional wheel, yet all of these men sought not salvation but the capitalization of an idea or representation.
In this light, Aristotle and Schopenhauer no longer resemble dinosaurs in their thought process—inasmuch as there is such a thing as enough. To add more jargon—bells, whistles, and shine—is entirely superfluous, and only serves to mislead the masses.
Pessimism is too often viewed as a bleak outlook, rather than what it truly is: the clarity to perceive the Planck Wall and its artificial parameters. By deducing movement and forms (as Plato did) through autodidactic pure reason, we are left with the world as representation—umwelt, or the world as it sees itself—which is all we ever truly have. And it is this very thing we barter away, moment by moment, into the rhetoric of false parameters and quasi-physics.
No comments:
Post a Comment
PLEASE COMMENT, OR ADD INFORMATION YOU FEEL PERTAINS