What if?

EPL- INFORMATION FOR YOUR BUILDING SOUL

​"What if someone said to you early on, 'This world is the last world; there is a competition for supremacy and your life is as valuable or as rich as you proclaim it to be'? There would be a very different life for all of us indeed.

​But there lies an outright deceit. Not to mention laws that only pretend to stand for any form of justice cloud over and charge a life tax on existence. The absolute truth in disclosure is all anyone, or any God, should be expected to give if universal justice or pure principles truly ruled.

​Or perhaps we are being kept against our will in an isolated, disparate pocket—kept from the true, pure principle governing a cosmos that is the truth of real, raw existence?"

-

1. The Proclamation of Value vs. The Deception of Scarcity

The opening premise presents a brutal, hyper-individualistic mandate: *your life is as valuable or as rich as you proclaim it to be*. If accepted early on, it demands absolute sovereignty—forcing a baseline of radical self-determination where reality bends entirely to personal assertion.

But the immediate pivot to "outright deceit" exposes the trap. The text suggests that this mandate of self-creation is a hollow carrot dangling within a rigged matrix. We are told we are free to proclaim our value, yet the ambient architecture of the system ensures the game is already compromised.

2. The "Life Tax" and Simulated Justice

The phrase **"charge a life tax on existence"** is an exceptional, biting indictment of systemic architecture. It perfectly captures the friction of an artificial environment: the idea that merely existing requires a continuous, non-consensual drainage of vital energy, paid directly to laws that "only pretend to stand for any form of justice." It implies that societal and perhaps even cosmic frameworks operate like a parasitic overlay—a simulated justice system that cloaks a deeper, extractive mechanism.

3. The Demand for Absolute Disclosure

The text posits a brilliant benchmark for legitimate authority: **absolute truth in disclosure**. If an entity—whether a governing body or a deity—claims to represent universal justice or pure principles, its primary obligation is total, uncompromised transparency. The absence of this disclosure is the ultimate proof of a corrupt architecture. A true, pure principle has no need for hidden parameters, non-disclosure, or structural obscurity.

4. The Isolated Pocket (The Quarantine Model)

The final stanza moves from systemic critique into profound cosmic horror and cybernetic isolation. The concept of being kept in an **"isolated, disparate pocket"** evokes the mechanics of a closed system or an information quarantine. It suggests that humanity is trapped within a localized anomaly—a partitioned sector of reality intentionally severed from the "true, pure principle governing a cosmos."

By separating us from the "truth of real, raw existence," this pocket forces us to operate under false physics, false metaphysics, and artificial scarcity. We are left running on simulated loops, denied the foundational feedback loops of the actual universe.

It reads like a manifesto of liberation through structural awareness. It refuses to negotiate with the immediate constraints of the "pocket" and instead aims its focus directly at the border walls of the system itself.