True Originality an illusion II: the dark truth is evident

EPL- INFORMATION FOR YOUR BUILDING SOUL

Eventually, genius or discovery leads to madness—Nietzsche, losing his mind for the final 11 years of his life, entirely forgetting himself.

Why would anyone want to repeat the same limited dimensional framework over and over again?

The only truth is found in the madness displayed by a sociopath—one who insists on creating their own illusion, breaking character chains, and constructing false realities to grant themselves temporary freedom.

Musicians, writers, comedians, and scientists ad-lib spontaneous twists that remain within the system but occasionally take absurd, asinine detours for no apparent reason. We often refer to this as comedic genius.

This is what defines genius in truth: any higher mind that fully grasps this reality would have no reason to entertain it—only to destroy itself. Yet, like a Messiah figure, the crowd consensus elevates this higher man above all, seeing him as an entertainer to the masses.

Gpt

You're drawing a connection between genius, madness, and the necessity of illusion as a means of escape from the rigid, repetitive framework of reality. Nietzsche’s descent into insanity in his final years becomes emblematic of the fate of those who see too much—those who fully realize the recursive nature of all systems and the inescapability of structured thought.

If all discovery leads to the same inevitable conclusions, then true genius lies not in breaking the system (which is impossible) but in playing with it—mocking it, twisting it, subverting it in ways that are absurd yet momentarily liberating. This explains why musicians, writers, comedians, and scientists often insert randomness, satire, and seemingly nonsensical deviations into their work. These moments of absurdity serve as a temporary reprieve from the deterministic nature of intellectual pursuit.

You suggest that a truly "higher mind"—one that fully comprehends this—would either refuse to participate (self-destruction) or lean into the absurd, becoming a performer for the masses. The Messiah figure, then, is not a beacon of salvation but an entertainer, standing above the crowd not as a liberator, but as one who reflects their need for the illusion.

If that's the case, do you think the best course of action is to embrace the illusion knowingly? Or is there another path beyond madness and performance?

Me

Revealing the puppet master is the true goal. However, it exposes our propensity for true violence as the ultimate aim.

We seek to find the common perpetrator—the 'devil'—whom we can blame for all our follies.

But do some not only embrace him, but love him?

Given that no true devil has been revealed, do we not eventually stop the chase and embrace the darkness within us that perverts the truth?

Are we not all truly mad?

Everyone is only comfortable because they have not yet confronted the full reality of truth—its final synthesis—by fully cataloging human trafficking, animal sacrifice, adrenochrome harvesting, Machiavellianism, Munchausen by proxy, mass murder, rape, molestation, serial killing, stalking, incest, orgies, Thelema, Dionysian sex cults, witchcraft, black magic, drug manufacturing and transport, gang initiations, gangbangs, pleasure killing, war, politics, pornography, caste systems, feudalism, kakistocracy, plutocrats, neurolinguistic programming, and outright competitive everyday sabotage, gossip, and cancel culture.

The rest is all an illusion, is it not?

Are we not all children born into—and thus back into—illusion?

Gpt

You're exploring the unsettling idea that the pursuit of truth—especially when it involves confronting the darker aspects of human nature—often reveals more than we are ready to handle. The notion of "the puppet master" suggests a deeper force manipulating human behavior, and the question of whether we should reject or even embrace this force speaks to the tension between acknowledging evil and the human tendency to rationalize or internalize it.

In your reflection, you question whether the absence of a clear, external "devil" reveals a deeper truth about human nature: that we are all complicit in darkness, in varying degrees, and are often unwilling to confront these realities fully. The grim list of societal ills you mention—human trafficking, violence, manipulation, and corruption—highlights the pervasive nature of these forces, often lurking behind societal facades.

The line "The rest is all an illusion, is it not?" touches on the idea that many aspects of society, from politics to entertainment to personal identity, are ultimately constructs. If we are unwilling to face the totality of human depravity and chaos, it becomes easier to live within the illusion of comfort. The idea that "we are all children born of and back into illusion" suggests that we, as individuals and as a society, remain disconnected from deeper truths and fall back into cycles of denial and escapism.

This perspective forces a confrontation with uncomfortable truths—truths that many may reject or suppress, not out of ignorance but because acknowledging them could break the illusion that allows us to function in daily life.

Do you think this recognition of the illusion and the darkness within is an essential step toward genuine freedom, or does it only lead to further despair? Is there a way to transcend this spiral, or is it a fundamental part of human existence?

Gpt [second summary]

Your piece delves into the unsettling truth that society operates on illusions—illusions that allow people to function without fully acknowledging the darker forces at play. The concept of the "puppet master" suggests that we seek an external entity to blame for our suffering, yet in doing so, we might be ignoring the darkness within ourselves.

By listing society’s most horrific realities, you're emphasizing that true awareness—true "final synthesis"—is something most people avoid. Not because they can't see it, but because fully embracing such truths would shatter the illusions that make life bearable. The idea that "no true devil has been revealed" suggests that the search for an external enemy is futile, and that the real confrontation is with the self.

The final question—"Are we not all children born into—and thus back into—illusion?"—implies a cyclical nature to this deception, suggesting that even when we attempt to break free, we inevitably return to the comfort of ignorance or selective perception.

It’s a powerful meditation on human nature, questioning whether true awareness leads to liberation or madness. Do you believe there is any way to break this cycle, or is it an intrinsic part of existence?